SkyLens
The Pentagon Just Hired Three Companies to Practice Pulling Dead Satellites Out of Orbit. The Same Technique Works on Live Ones.
Public NASA Images Library · images.nasa.gov

Space Security · 2026-08-16

The Pentagon Just Hired Three Companies to Practice Pulling Dead Satellites Out of Orbit. The Same Technique Works on Live Ones.

Three private companies just received Pentagon study contracts to learn how to grab a satellite out of orbit.

The official framing is tidy: Firefly Aerospace, D-Orbit, and Katalyst Space Technologies will compete to show defense agencies how commercial operators could capture and remove aging US government spacecraft. Clean up old hardware. Responsible stewardship.

Here's the part nobody's saying out loud: every skill you need to remove a dead satellite is identical to the skill required to capture a live one.

The Hardest Problem in Space

Think about what satellite capture actually demands.

You have to find a specific object moving at 7 kilometres per second. Match its velocity — in three dimensions, across hundreds of kilometres of approach — without GPS in some orbital regimes. Grapple it, potentially while it's tumbling. Redirect it to a graveyard orbit or burn it up on re-entry.

Until recently, only nation-state space agencies attempted this. Now three commercial companies — none of them household names — are being asked to solve it for the Pentagon.

7 km/sSpeed of a satellite in low orbit
3Companies now studying capture tech
16,106Total tracked objects in orbit today

That's the number on the SkyLens live tracker right now. Every single one of them exists in an environment where satellite-capture technology is about to go commercial.

Key takeaway: The US is outsourcing satellite-capture research to private industry for the first time. That could reflect confidence in commercial space — or urgency about a threat that's already here.

Who Are These Three Companies?

They aren't Boeing or Lockheed. They're the next generation.

Firefly Aerospace — Cedar Park, Texas

Built its name on small launch vehicles. Now quietly expanding into orbital services. Their Alpha rocket has reached orbit. Their ambitions apparently reach further.

D-Orbit — Italy / global operations

Specialises in orbital transfer. Their ION satellite carrier has ferried dozens of payloads to precise orbital slots across multiple missions. They know how to manoeuvre in space with precision.

Katalyst Space Technologies

Focused on satellite servicing and life extension — think orbital roadside assistance. Their entire business model is approaching existing spacecraft and doing something useful with them.

None of them are household names. That's often how the Pentagon prefers it. Awarding a competitive study contract is how you develop a sensitive capability before you announce that it exists.

China Already Did This. Nobody Said Much.

In late 2022, China's SJ-21 satellite approached a defunct Compass-1G navigation satellite — and moved it to a graveyard orbit 300 kilometres higher. Smoothly. Quietly. No press release.

The US Space Force watched. They catalogued it. Then, mostly, they said nothing publicly.

In 2020, Russia's Cosmos 2542 spent months trailing a classified US reconnaissance satellite close enough that the State Department formally complained it was behaving in a "threatening" manner.

Cosmos 2542
Russian satellite that shadowed a US spy satellite for months in 2020 — no weapon was fired. None was needed.

Neither mission was called a "disposal." Neither required that label. Both demonstrated that the capability to approach and interact with another nation's satellite — benignly or otherwise — is real, operational, and spreading.

To be fair: US defense agencies have publicly stated the goal is environmental — removing their own aging spacecraft that clutter valuable orbital slots and pose debris collision risks. That's a genuine problem. Programs like DARPA's RSGS (Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites) have been openly funded for years. The stated mission is legitimate. But dual-use technology is, by definition, dual-use.

The Math That Keeps Space Lawyers Awake

A satellite-capture vehicle has no civilian mode switch. It either has the capability or it doesn't.

The vehicle that docks with your own dead satellite to de-orbit it uses the same sensors, the same proximity manoeuvring software, the same grappling hardware as a vehicle designed to intercept someone else's active satellite. You cannot physically separate the capability from the application.

~120Active defence satellites publicly catalogued
~1,900Objects in orbit with "unknown" purpose
0Binding international treaties on satellite capture

There are no international treaties governing satellite capture. The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 prohibits weapons of mass destruction in orbit and the militarisation of celestial bodies. It says nothing about one satellite approaching another. The legal vacuum is enormous.

The uncomfortable reality: One space policy analyst framed it clearly last year: "We cannot cede the capability to remove things from orbit to China. If we don't develop it commercially, they develop it exclusively." Both sides of that argument are correct simultaneously. That's the problem.

Why Commercial? Why Now?

Defence agencies have been funding satellite servicing research in government labs for decades. Bringing commercial competitors into a study contract signals something different: they want this solved fast, and they want multiple approaches on the table.

The urgency isn't hard to find. China's Qianfan constellation is growing rapidly — hundreds of new satellites launched in the last two years, many with undisclosed secondary payloads. Russia has continued testing proximity-manoeuvring capabilities despite the war in Ukraine consuming resources. And the orbital environment is only getting more crowded.

~600+
New Chinese satellites launched in the past three years — many carrying undisclosed payloads

Every new satellite in orbit is an asset. Every asset is potentially a target. And now three private companies are learning how to reach out and touch them.

What Comes Next

Firefly, D-Orbit, and Katalyst will present their approaches through the study phase. One or more designs could become an operational program. If that happens, Earth orbit will have something it's never had before: commercial, on-demand satellite removal — with all the implications that carries.

The stars don't negotiate. The satellites in front of them are starting to play a very different game.

Track the full orbital environment — including which objects have unknown operators — on the SkyLens live tracker. And follow more stories on the evolving space security landscape at the SkyLens blog.

Watch the orbital environment liveOpen live tracker

SkyLens editorial — live CelesTrak + NASA/JPL data (16106 objects)

Related stories

Nuclear Weapons in Space Are Banned by Treaty. A New Satellite Design Could Finally Catch One.

Space Security · 2026-07-16

Nuclear Weapons in Space Are Banned by Treaty. A New Satellite Design Could Finally Catch One.
36 Satellites Are Being Built Right Now Whose Only Job Is to Watch for Missile Launches. One Fires, They Know in Seconds. The Pentagon Just Spent $1.75 Billion to Make Sure of It.

Space Security · 2026-07-14

36 Satellites Are Being Built Right Now Whose Only Job Is to Watch for Missile Launches. One Fires, They Know in Seconds. The Pentagon Just Spent $1.75 Billion to Make Sure of It.
The Milky Way Cannibalized a Galaxy 12 Billion Years Ago. NASA Just Reconstructed How It Happened.

Deep Space · 2026-08-19

The Milky Way Cannibalized a Galaxy 12 Billion Years Ago. NASA Just Reconstructed How It Happened.
All posts Live tracker UAP files