SkyLens
NASA's Artemis II SLS Rocket and Orion Spacecraft Rollout to Launch Pad 39B · Public NASA Images Library · images.nasa.gov

Moon & Space Race · 2026-06-09

China Is Building a Permanent Moon Base by 2035. The US Is Racing to Get There First. Whoever Wins Controls Something Worth More Than Oil.

Gene Cernan stepped off the lunar surface on December 14, 1972. He glanced back once. Then he climbed into the lunar module and left.

No human has touched the Moon since.

That was 53 years ago. The entire internet was invented in that time. Smartphones. The human genome. The International Space Station. Two generations grew up and had children of their own. And the Moon just sat there — untouched, waiting.

Now three countries are sprinting back. And this time, it has nothing to do with Cold War pride.

53Years since the last human footprint on the Moon
3Nations actively racing to return right now
2035China's target year for a permanent lunar base

There Is Water on the Moon. That Changes the Entire Game.

Here's what they didn't teach in school: the Moon has water. A lot of it.

Not rivers or rain — but hundreds of millions of metric tonnes of ice, buried inside permanently shadowed craters at the lunar south pole. Craters so deep that sunlight hasn't touched their floors in billions of years. NASA's SOFIA telescope and multiple orbiters confirmed it. The ice is real.

And in space, water isn't just for drinking.

Split it into hydrogen and oxygen and you have rocket fuel. You can refuel spacecraft directly on the Moon's surface and launch missions to Mars, the asteroid belt, or Jupiter without carrying every drop of propellant from Earth. The Moon becomes a gas station at the edge of the inner solar system — and whoever builds it first sets the price.

600 million
Metric tonnes of water ice estimated at the Moon's south pole (NASA)
Key takeaway: Whoever controls the lunar south pole controls the fuel supply for the entire solar system. That's why every major space program on Earth is targeting the same patch of craters — the same shadowed valleys, the same ice deposits. The same real estate.

India Got There First. Russia Crashed Trying.

On August 23, 2023, something remarkable happened quietly.

India's Chandrayaan-3 lander set down near the Moon's south pole. First spacecraft in history to reach that region. Ever. India — not the US, not China, not Russia — got there first.

Four days earlier, Russia's Luna-25 probe had crashed into the lunar surface attempting the same landing. It was Russia's first Moon mission in 47 years. It ended in fragments.

India celebrated in the streets. The footage went global. And something shifted in the geopolitical calculation: the Moon race isn't a two-horse race anymore.

Aug 23, 2023India's south pole landing — a world first
47 yearsGap between Russia's Moon missions
14 daysHow long Chandrayaan-3 operated before lunar night ended it

China Is Playing a Different Kind of Long Game

While other agencies hold press conferences, China quietly does things that shouldn't be possible.

In 2019, Chang'e 4 landed on the far side of the Moon. Nobody had ever done that. The far side never faces Earth — you can't communicate directly with anything there. China first launched a dedicated relay satellite, positioned it precisely in a gravitational sweet spot, then landed a rover. Flawlessly. On a surface no spacecraft had ever touched.

In 2020, Chang'e 5 returned lunar samples to Earth — the first sample return from the Moon since the Soviet Luna program in 1976. In 2024, Chang'e 6 went further still: it landed on the far side and came back with samples from a crater that had never been sampled before in the history of spaceflight.

China's official plan: crewed Moon landing by 2030. A permanent research station at the south pole by 2035. Not a visit. A base with people in it.

To be fair: China's announced timelines have sometimes slipped, and the 2030 crewed landing and 2035 base are aspirational targets — not guaranteed outcomes. NASA has also faced repeated delays: Artemis III's crewed landing has been pushed back multiple times from its original 2024 target. Both programs are real, both are ambitious, and both are behind schedule. The race is genuine. The finish line keeps moving.

What NASA's Artemis Actually Is

In November 2022, Artemis I launched. No crew aboard — it was a test flight. But the numbers were staggering. The Space Launch System generated 8.8 million pounds of thrust at liftoff — more than any rocket currently flying. The Orion capsule traveled 2.25 million kilometers over 25 days, venturing farther from Earth than any human-rated spacecraft had ever gone.

Artemis II — the first crewed flight around the Moon since 1972 — is scheduled for 2026. Four astronauts. A loop around the Moon. No landing, but the closest humans have come in half a century. Artemis III, an actual crewed landing targeting the lunar south pole, follows after that.

You can track what NASA currently has in orbit and understand active mission profiles on the SkyLens learn page — it maps everything from ISS altitude to deep space in real time.

8.8M lbs
Thrust from NASA's SLS rocket — more than any rocket currently operational

The Other Resource Nobody Talks About

Water ice is just the beginning. There's something stranger buried in the Moon's regolith.

Helium-3. A rare isotope that's almost nonexistent on Earth. The Moon is saturated with it — billions of tonnes deposited over billions of years by the solar wind, which Earth's magnetic field deflects but the Moon cannot. It just accumulates in the lunar soil, undisturbed.

Why it matters: helium-3 is a candidate fuel for nuclear fusion. Unlike current fusion research, a helium-3 reaction produces almost no radioactive waste. Clean. Efficient. And the estimated energy locked in the Moon's helium-3 reserves is equivalent to ten times all the fossil fuels ever burned on Earth.

To be clear: viable helium-3 fusion doesn't exist yet in practice. We don't have working fusion reactors for any fuel type. But the physics is sound in theory — and China, the US, and ESA all have active research programs quietly working on it. The fact that every space power is racing toward the same south pole region — rich in both water ice and helium-3 — is not a coincidence.

~1M tonnesEstimated helium-3 in the Moon's surface soil
10×More energy potential than all Earth's fossil fuels (theoretical)
0Radioactive waste from helium-3 fusion — if it works

The Legal Grey Zone That Could Start the Next Conflict

Here's the uncomfortable part nobody wants to say clearly.

The 1967 Outer Space Treaty says no country can own the Moon. But it says nothing specific about resources extracted from the Moon. The US, Luxembourg, and several other nations have passed domestic laws quietly asserting that companies can own resources they mine in space — water, helium-3, metals, whatever they dig up.

China has not agreed to those frameworks.

NASA has introduced the concept of "safety exclusion zones" around landing sites — areas where other nations should not operate to avoid interference. The legal status of those zones under international law is completely undefined. No court. No arbitration body. No agreed enforcement mechanism.

When two rovers from different countries both target the same ice-filled crater — and that day is coming within the decade — nobody has agreed what happens next. The transparency gap between what governments do in space and what they tell the public has historically been wider than most people realize.

Key takeaway: The Moon race is territorial, not just scientific. The south pole craters could determine who controls the infrastructure of deep space exploration for the next century — and the legal framework for who owns what simply does not exist yet.

Why We Stopped for 53 Years

People always ask: why did we stop?

The answer is mundane and a little devastating: money and politics. Apollo cost roughly $280 billion in today's dollars. Once the space race was won, Congress slashed NASA's budget by more than half. Apollo 18, 19, and 20 were cancelled mid-development. The Saturn V rockets — the most powerful ever flown, the machines that got humans to the Moon — were retired and put in museums.

We built the technology to leave Earth and reach another world. Then we dismantled it because it was expensive and the Cold War was ending.

Now, half a century later, we're building it again. This time there are multiple players, multiple rockets, multiple motivations — and multiple definitions of what "winning" means.

2019 — China

Chang'e 4 becomes first spacecraft to land on the Moon's far side. A relay satellite makes communication possible from a place that never faces Earth.

2020 — China

Chang'e 5 returns lunar samples to Earth. First sample return from the Moon since 1976.

2022 — NASA

Artemis I launches. Orion capsule travels 2.25 million km — farther than any human-rated spacecraft ever built.

2023 — India

Chandrayaan-3 lands at the lunar south pole. First spacecraft in history to reach that region. India beats every other nation to the most valuable real estate on the Moon.

2024 — China

Chang'e 6 returns samples from the lunar far side. A location never sampled before in spaceflight history.

2026 — NASA (planned)

Artemis II: first crewed lunar flyby since 1972. Four astronauts. No landing — but the closest humans have come to the Moon in a generation.

2030 — China (target)

First Chinese taikonauts on the Moon. If achieved, it ends the US's 60-year monopoly on human Moon missions.

2035 — China (target)

Permanent research station at the south pole. Not a visit. A base with personnel.

What Happens Next

The next decade will determine whether the Moon becomes a shared scientific commons or the site of the first territorial dispute in deep space.

For the first time since 1972, two crewed spacecraft from different countries could both be on — or near — the Moon simultaneously. Both aiming for the same south pole. Both looking at the same permanently shadowed craters. Both with different ideas about what happens after they arrive.

The Moon has been there for 4.5 billion years. Untouched. Unclaimed. Waiting.

That particular era ends in this decade. One way or another.

Explore what's currently operating in orbit — from LEO satellites to deep space missions — on the SkyLens live tracker.

Read more space storiesOpen blog

SkyLens editorial — live CelesTrak + NASA/JPL data (15629 objects)

All posts Live tracker UAP files