UAP · 2026-05-29
AARO — what the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office actually is, and what its mandate covers
The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office — universally known by the acronym AARO — is the United States Department of Defense organisation established in 2022 as the central federal interlocutor for unidentified anomalous phenomena cases involving US military operations and operational environments. AARO consolidated the work of several predecessor entities, most notably the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG) which itself succeeded the earlier Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF). Understanding AARO's actual mandate — and the limits of that mandate — is essential to interpreting the US institutional UAP record of the 2020s.
The legislative basis
AARO's existence rests on a series of provisions in the National Defense Authorization Acts of the early 2020s — primarily the FY2022 NDAA, which established the AOIMSG, and subsequent NDAAs which expanded the mandate and renamed the entity. The legislative text directs the Office to detect, identify, and attribute objects of interest in, on, or near military installations, operating areas, training areas, special use airspace, and similar environments, and to mitigate any associated threats. The mandate is specifically "all-domain" — covering airborne, space-based, maritime, and trans-medium phenomena — which is a substantive expansion over the earlier UAPTF airborne-only focus.
The Office reports through the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security and coordinates with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for the intelligence-community-facing portions of its work.
What AARO does in practice
AARO's operational activity consists of receiving, cataloguing, and investigating UAP reports from US military components and certain other federal agencies; conducting historical-record research into prior US government UAP programmes; producing classified and unclassified assessments for Congress; and operating a public-facing reporting and information channel (including the aaro.mil website and certain published case material). The Office does not have law-enforcement authority and does not directly investigate civilian UAP cases. It coordinates with the Federal Aviation Administration, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Department of Energy as appropriate.
The Office's caseload is substantial. AARO has reported total case intake numbering in the several hundreds in each of its public annual reports, with the cases divided between contemporary observations and historical records reopened for re-assessment.
What AARO does not do
Important limits apply. AARO does not investigate civilian UAP reports outside the military-relevant environment. It does not have authority over other-agency historical records that those agencies decline to share. Its public-facing case releases are subject to the standard military and intelligence classification framework, which means that the most operationally significant cases are typically the cases for which public material is most limited. And its mandate does not include resolving the underlying scientific or interpretive question of what UAP cases ultimately represent — its mandate is to detect, identify, and attribute, not to adjudicate.
For comparison with the historical predecessors (Project Blue Book, the Robertson Panel, the Condon Committee) and with parallel international frameworks, see the SkyLens UAP files page.
Editorial note: Independent SkyLens analysis of the contemporary US UAP institutional framework (AARO, UAPTF, AATIP) and the public documents and testimony associated with it. The case index linking related releases is on the SkyLens UAP files page.
SkyLens editorial — AARO and modern US UAP institutional record